Exchange exports, wallet histories and DeFi positions arrive as one case file. The Workspace reconciles them, reconstructs how the wealth was built, screens the counterparties, and records the rationale behind the decision.
Each view answers a question an analyst has to answer before signing off, and every figure drills down to the transactions behind it.
The question it answers “Can this case be signed off at all, or is an input missing?”
Coverage is scored per wallet and per counterparty hop, by count and by amount, so a gap is visible before it becomes an assumption. A stated gap is something a reviewer can work with; a silent one is not.
The question it answers “Where did the money actually come from, line by line?”
Deposits, trading, staking, lending and NFT activity are reconstructed across exchanges and on-chain, and the client’s own money is held apart from third-party flows rather than absorbed into one total.
The question it answers “Did this build up plausibly over time, or appear all at once?”
Every event carries its date, venue, amount, transaction identifier and share of the total, so accumulation can be followed rather than taken on trust.
The question it answers “Are the claimed gains real, and do they match performance?”
Realised and unrealised gains are pinpointed by asset, exchange and wallet, then checked against how the asset actually performed over the period.
The question it answers “Who sent this money, and what stands behind them?”
Counterparties and their exposure paths are surfaced with the value that flowed, so abnormal patterns show up without turning the review into a forensic investigation.
The question it answers “What will our own screening find that this file did not mention?”
Illicit-activity checks run on the declared portfolio through our partner blockchain-analysis provider, or through the tool your team already uses, and the findings sit in the case context rather than in a separate report.
Previews are illustrative sample data, drawn from the same components the live Workspace renders.
Every case carries a drafted account of how the wealth was built, and a short list of the places worth opening before anyone signs it off.
The question it answers “Where should a reviewer look first, and why?”
The figures are calculated from the case data and the wording is drafted around them, so a supervisor can follow the reasoning and check any number against the section it came from. The decision stays with the analyst.
The parts of a crypto Source-of-Wealth review that currently live outside any system.
A demo walks a real Source-of-Wealth review end to end, from the raw exports to the signed report. Bring a case that gave your team trouble.
